Boks Postscript

Postscript

I repeatedly keep thinking about- is there any mistake in the book? Is there any mistake in the deduction? However, I can not find any mistake after reiterative search. The book is named as “conclusion” for the following reasons: Firstly, no self-consumption and imagination in this book, and the physics definition can be found in ‘College Physics’ and ‘General Physics’. Particularly, the dependent radiation in electric field wave and magnetic field wave is the great Hertz experiment logic which is not my self-imagination; and light velocity superposition has been verified by many actual applications. Secondly, the math deduction is general in ‘math manual’ rather than my self-deduced equations, also no mistake has been found in the deduction equations. Thirdly, the book is the negation of curl theory foundation and relative theory foundation, making all-around negation for its argument, deduction, argument evidence and conclusion. Besides, it interprets electromagnetic induction by Lorentz magnetic force, wireless application by both Lorentz magnetic force and Hertz experiment, and historically important experiments by both the Newton’s law and light velocity superposition. Above all, Maxwell curl theory and Einstein relative theory are all established on false theory foundation. Although the laypeople can state some theories, their theories can be unnecessarily the true ones because of the technology development limitation. “Bringing order out of chaos” is added in the book because of the consideration of present condition in China- money is everything, and the physics study is unprofitable without too much concern for it. To avoid this, the word is added.

What’s the reason for the two great scientists to make such a mistake? As for this, I ponder about it some time. The main cause is the scientific development at that time when ether is dominant in Maxwell time, the Maxwell curl theory origins from ether medium, people have no knowledge of charge as well as current, and Michelson-Morley experiment was made in ether medium. Lorentz transformation was adopted to interpret light-interference experiment in ether medium, and then Einstein was wrongly misled to study the black hole of ‘the relative ether motion of measurable or immeasurable’. In another word, if the unsymmetrical space in ether curl theory and ether medium and Michelson-Morley experiment result provide no evidences for relative theory, the ether Lorentz hypothesis tool for relative theory will not exist, and then it is impossible to explain the relative theory of " measurable or immeasurable relative to ether motion”, so ether causes the relative theory and harms Einstein. What’s more, study method may be another reason.

I remember once my middle school teachers and college teachers have remarked, logical deduction is essential to math, concept and connotation are essential to physics, and equation equilibrium is essential to chemistry’.

Einstein made a mistake because he does not adopt physical definition and connotation to study physics but the pure math transformation to understand physical nature. The relative theory is dependent on Lorentz hypothesis and has become a math game from the beginning. It seems that he wants the math game to guide the physical experiment, and to improve and develop the space.

Maxwell is a half math issue and a half physical issue; he focuses on mathematical formula but paying no attention to the condition of applying the formula; and focuses on physic equations but not on physical definition, putting the equation into the spin computing. As pointed out by Lorentz, Maxwell had never believed electric charge but replace it with electric charge displacement, so that people are confused about what he refers to electric charge. He never questions where the magnetic field comes from. In his theory, the magnetic field seems to come from an infinitude place which does not need any source. Actually, the electric charge motion is the source of all magnetic fields. The field will not produce the field.

The book concludes the classic physical definitions and modern physical laws, solves the three key disputes in physical history, resurrects the correct time-space view, reveals the light motion nature and light superposition theory as well as generation mechanism of electric wave and radiation model, provides evidences for Newton-Galileo time-space view and general Lorentz magnetic force, and denies Einstein and Maxwell curl theory.

The Author, ZENG Qingping

Oct, 2007, in Wuhan, China